![]() | |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: bad economy
[quote=Reaper;707970] Quote:
A mate of mine only gets around 40mpg from his 2001 Carbed Dyna. My 09 Bob almost always returns 50 + and I don't bimble around. I guess the EFI makes the difference?
__________________ Reality is just a matter of perspective! |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: bad economy
Yea I'd go with that, around 40 - 45 MPG seems about right, only time mine gets higher is when I'm tootling around the dales at warp factor tractor
__________________ ![]() ![]() Tones ® Yorkshire Born, Bred 'N' Proud Of It 2000 FXD '74 T140V |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() Do you mean go that fast, or use that much fuel....
__________________ Graham Harley owner since 1974, currently: 1990 FLHS/2008 V107T, 2003 FXDXT, 2007 XB12R, MG ZT 260SE. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: bad economy
off to Germany tonight about 2,000mls there and back i am staying just one night!!! i am going to try to keep the speed down abit and see if that helps economy(70ish) bye the way i am going to the diesel motorcycle rally with Dieing to see you Dave ( he,s an undertaker) in Hamm (Germany) and on the menu is a hog roast!!! fitting or what.john
__________________ (old iron ass) ride it dont hide it |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: bad economy
update well i got back last night after a fairly hectic week end!!! it started on Friday morning a ride to a rally in mid Germany we arrived at7pm Friday evening after covering 700mls, this was an ideal time to do a economy check so we decided to stick to 70ish mph. Dave rides a big glide a efi so it would be ideal to compare consumption? well on fill-ups at 150 mls i was using 1 ltr more than Dave ( that with a 1550 203cam anda 42mukuni carb) we spent one day at the rally then the 700ml ride home!!! So i think Simon was right the magic speed is 80mph keep below that and there's not alot of difference between carb and EFI on the consumption frontat these speeds john
__________________ (old iron ass) ride it dont hide it |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: bad economy
Something worth mentioning is the air-filter, if you have a K&N. I serviced mine for the first time last year (even though they're supposed to be OK for 60-100,000 miles) and noticed the consumption had increased, so I was getting only 38-39 mpg. I suspected I'd been over enthusiastic with the filter oil. Did the 40,000 mile service last week, and was a lot more careful, dribbling only just enough to colour the filter. Result? Immediate decrease in consumption, to 40-42 mpg. You wouldn't think a wee bit of oil would have such a big effect, but it does...
__________________ I guess you'd say I'm on my way to |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |